Twenty-Five Year Award for Metro in Washington, D.C.
Each
day, nearly a million people experience the architecture in the
Washington, D.C. Metro, either in stations Haary Weese designed or ones
derived from his common design kit-of-parts. This makes the metro, which
opened in 1976, second only to New York City’s subway in daily
ridership. The AIA recognized an architectural design of enduring
significance.
Station-to-station,
line-to-line, its unity and coherence is immutable. Across 86 stations
(underground, at-grade, and elevated) spread over five lines that cover
106 miles, the design identity of each station shines through. If one’s
commute begins at a ground-level suburban fringe station next to a
parking lot and ends at a hub of crisscrossing train tracks deep below
downtown D.C., the common design elements and shared materials make each
space navigable and understandable. Colossal concrete vaults, granite
and bronze are put together in an unmistakably monumental, Mid-Century
Modern manner. These design elements, created by Weese over 40 years
ago, still define Metro, as its newest stations on the Silver Line march
further into the Virginia suburbs, set to open later in 2014.
From
1960 to 1970, the population of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan
region exploded, adding nearly a million people, even as the population
of the District of Columbia shrank. Metro would better connect the city
and suburbs, and make urban living more convenient and vibrant.
Implicitly, there was the hope that investing in Metro would save the
suffering mid-century city as a typology, giving the nation a successful
case study of how transit can help turn around urbanism in decline.
“The
Metro changed Washington, D.C., from a sleepy Southern town into a
world-class capital city,” said Jack Hartray, who worked for Weese on
Metro. From the outset, Weese and Metro knew exactly what they did not
want: the New York City subway. Metro was defined totally in opposition
to the most successful urban rail transit system in North America.
Instead, Metro would be airy, spacious, and ennobling. It would
accomplish this through size and scale. As Harry Weese explained in The
Great Society Subway, “Our whole thrust is to maximize the volume.” It
would use the formal language of monumental civic architecture, seen so
often in Washington’s federal buildings, and watch it seep into the
earth, below ground, for the yeoman’s task of public transit.
Washington’s recent ascendance, beyond being the national political capital, into an emerging cultural and artistic creative class destination probably couldn’t have happened without Metro. It’s radically reshaped D.C., enabling the redevelopment of long-suffering neighborhoods into magnets for the young, highly educated and affluent knowledge economy workers that drive its booming economy.
Washington’s recent ascendance, beyond being the national political capital, into an emerging cultural and artistic creative class destination probably couldn’t have happened without Metro. It’s radically reshaped D.C., enabling the redevelopment of long-suffering neighborhoods into magnets for the young, highly educated and affluent knowledge economy workers that drive its booming economy.
The
Twenty-five Year Award is conferred on a structure that has stood the
test of time by embodying architectural excellence for 25 to 35 years.
Projects must demonstrate excellence in function, in the distinguished
execution of its original program, and in the creative aspects of its
statement by today’s standards. The award will be presented this June at
the AIA National Convention in Chicago, the home of its architect,
Harry Weese, who died in 1998.
No comments:
Post a Comment